-
Forests provide important economic resource for the rural and urban poor, providing everything from fuelwood and timber, cooking oils and bushmeat to agricultural inputs and medicinal products. They are also the source of globally-valued products and services. Public involvement in forest management has important governance dimensions. It also has major implications for the integration of poor rural producers into the national and international economy. This has potential equity benefits, but also harbours many risks. Our Programme aims to increase understanding of the livelihood values of forests, and to identify opportunities for the rural poor to obtain greater benefits from the commercial use of forest products. Key areas of involvement include: - Landscape-level analysis and planning as a means of meeting both biodiversity and rural livelihoods objectives;
- Community involvement in timber transformation and downstream processing;
- Commercialisation of non-timber forest products;
- Bushmeat as a trade and wildlife management issue;
- Domestication of indigenous trees;
- On-farm tree conservation;
- Establishment of an electronic resource on rural development forestry.
- Parent themes:
-
Authors: Leo Peskett
-
This paper looks systematically at how benefit sharing can be understood in the context of national REDD+ systems, and the possible implications of different benefit sharing arrangements. The paper addresses three main questions: What does benefit sharing mean in the context of REDD+? What are the options for establishing benefit sharing systems in different REDD+ approaches? What are the implications of different benefit sharing arrangements for poor people?
- 48 pages
-
Published by
REDD-net and World Bank
This resources was an output of the following ODI project: REDD-net
.
-
Download from redd-net.org
-
Authors: Leo Peskett
-
Drawing on experience from emerging REDD+ approaches and from existing benefit sharing schemes in development policy, this policy note outlines the different components of benefit sharing systems and considers their implications for poor people.
- 12 pages
-
Published by
REDD-net and World Bank
This resources was an output of the following ODI project: REDD-net
.
-
Download from redd-net.org
-
Authors: Leo Peskett and Gernot Brodnig
-
This policy note summarizes what carbon rights are, how they are relevant in REDD+ and the main implications that could arise for poor and vulnerable people.
- 16 pages
-
Published by
REDD-net and World Bank
This resources was an output of the following ODI project: REDD-net
.
-
Download from redd-net.org
-
Authors: Alice Caravani
-
This case study outlines the operation and benefit sharing arrangements under Brazil's Amazon Fund.
- 8 pages
-
Published by
REDD-net and World Bank
This resources was an output of the following ODI project: REDD-net
.
-
Download from redd-net.org
-
Authors: Leo Peskett
-
This case study explores benefit sharing options for REDD+ in Indonesia which have mainly resembled the ‘nested’ approach to REDD+.
- 8 pages
-
Published by
REDD-net and World Bank
This resources was an output of the following ODI project: REDD-net
.
-
Download from redd-net.org
-
Authors: Leo Peskett
-
This case study explores national level benefit sharing options for REDD+ in Tanzania where REDD+ is likely to be based on Participatory Forest Management approaches.
- 8 pages
-
Published by
REDD-net and World Bank
This resources was an output of the following ODI project: REDD-net
.
-
Download from redd-net.org
-
Authors: Leo Peskett
-
This case study provides a short description of benefit sharing arrangements under the Nile Basin Reforestation Project in Uganda.
- 8 pages
-
Published by
REDD-net and World Bank
This resources was an output of the following ODI project: REDD-net
.
-
Download from redd-net.org
|
Related links
Programmes and themes
|