|
The second workshop of the CSPP South East Asia Regional
Consultation was held in Phnom Penh, Cambodia, on the 21st
and 22nd June 2005, in collaboration with the MEDiCAM.
The two-day workshop on 'CSOs, Evidence and Policy Influence'
was attended by representatives of CSOs, educational institutes
and bilateral and multilateral donor agencies working in Cambodia
and provided a forum to discuss the opportunities and challenges
for CSOs to use evidence to inform policy, learn about the
latest worldwide research and practice in this area, share
experiences about ongoing activities and identify opportunities
for collaborative work. See the Regional
Consultation index for more information on the consultation
process.
Dr. Sin Somuny, Executive Director of MEDiCAM, facilitated
the workshop with Mr. Ros Hoy. The workshop was presided over
by H.E. Dr. Mam Bun Heng, Secretary of State, Ministry of
Health, the Royal Government of Cambodia, who gave a welcome
address. Presentations
were given on the RAPID and CSP programmes at ODI, RAPID's
Context, Evidence and Links Framework (powerpoint
presentation 570kb) and two
case studies from Cambodia.
Dr. Brett Ballard from Cambodian Development Resource Institute
(CDRI) presented a case study on 'Evidence and Policy in Cambodia:
Lessons Learnt, Opportunities and Constraints' in which two
case studies dealing with participatory poverty assessment
in the Tonlé Sap region were discussed. Dr. Sin Somuny
presented a case study
on MEDiCAM (powerpoint presentation 78kb)
as an example of a Cambodian CSO that advocates for policy
change. He also highlighted several lessons learned: empirical
evidence is the best way to support policy changes; NGOs/CSOs
need to work closely together; a well-documented consensus
between CSOs is essential for making sure that the recommendations
made are considered to be credible by the government; and
risk can be reduced by CSOs not being too confrontational
and not aligning with any political party.
During the plenary discussion participants brainstormed on
the general policy constraints they faced, what tools have
been used for successfully dealing with them, and how policy
makers should be approached. Group work involved participants
considering familiar case studies and analysis of the cases
using the CEL framework.
The main lessons learned throughout the two days of discussions
were:
- Involving the beneficiaries in understanding any problem
and supporting its solution is crucial for developing a
sense of ownership by all the stakeholders;
- CSOs should be able to access government data;
- Public awareness can be difficult when people are frightened
or intimidated by local officials;
- CSOs should avoid alignment with any particular political
party;
- Both formal and informal networks need to be identified
- CSOs must work both 'inside and outside' the government
to have sustained impact over policy;
- Utilise public forums, such as TWGs, whenever possible;
- It is necessary to be both confrontational and constructive;
- The more people/groups behind a topic or cause, the safer
it will be for them to advocate for change. It is difficult
to stand alone in Cambodia, especially in isolated, rural
areas as personal safety can be at stake;
- Capacity building is needed for both government and CSO
staff;
- Empower the community to participate in the policy making
process. Local authorities such as Commune Councils can
be very useful partners in this process;
- Links to the private sector can also be beneficial in
influencing policy.
Participants were asked to make recommendations on how ODI
can further support Cambodia's CSOs in influencing policy.
Suggestions included:
- Providing training on research methodology;
- Working with CSO networks to improve advocacy and negotiation
skills with policy makers;
- Funding for local CSOs;
- Developing capacity on policy analysis, advocacy, human
resources and support institutional development;
- Organising study tours and exchange visits to foreign
countries to examine other nations' successes in influencing
government's policy;
- Sharing experience through website, e-mails;
- Providing technical and financial support for pilot policy
initiatives, from research to advocacy;
- Strengthening existing advocacy networks.
Click on the links below if you would like further information.
Back to Regional Consultations index |
|