|
|
Publication
Abstract
Economic Society and Governance in 16 Developing Countries,
World Governance Survey Discussion Paper 8
Economic society refers to state-market relations, issues
that have increasing prominence in an era of liberalization,
democratization and globalization. As part of a project to
undertake comprehensive governance assessments, we focus here
on the nature of the rules (formal and informal) that affect
economic society. Is there respect for property rights? Are
regulations applied equally? Can business licenses be obtained
without corrupt transactions? Is there consultation between
the public and private sectors? Are global rules taken into
account in developing policy? The way states intervene to
shape or reshape these rules tend to be noted by the business
community and also society more generally. Such issues are
important for legitimacy as well as for policy outcomes related
to national development.
This paper presents the findings on the economic society
arena in 16 developing countries. Three observations stand
out. The first is that governance in the economic society
arena can make a difference regardless of existing level of
economic development and cultural orientation. The top scorers
in this arena are countries with widely different backgrounds.
The second point is that ex-socialist countries seem to encounter
greater difficulties in this arena than those countries, which
have had already for some time an exposure to a market economy.
Their transition to a market economy is relatively recent
and it must be acknowledged that it takes time. The third
point is that most countries have made progress, including
those with problems. Economic reform is paying off, even if
it may be more slowly than many international advisors would
like. Even if globalization and liberalization have had positive
impacts on these countries, most of them continue to battle
with issues that affect the business climate, in particular,
and governance of the regime, in general.
There are a number of implications for researchers and practitioners.
For researchers, we believe the priority is for further investigation
on how informal property rights may serve as the basis for
formalization and the development of a legalized property
rights system. For practitioners, a key issue is to go beyond
the current tendency to focus primarily on issues of efficiency
in this arena and to also focus on issues of legitimacy. The
findings, illustrated most topically by Russia and Argentina,
highlight the damage that can be caused by an unregulated
unleashing of the private sector. Our study suggests that
a more comprehensive strategy of improving both state and
market institutions as well as linkages between them may be
a more sustainable strategy to pursue. In a similar way, more
attention needs to be paid to the social implications of the
new economic rules that globalization is bringing to each
national economy. Although the existing liberal orthodoxy
continues to be the driving force behind much of the improved
governance in this arena, it needs to be sufficiently tempered
so that the gains to date are not reversed by a backlash caused
by hubris.
Back to publications page
|