- 13 items
Sort by
Search results
-
Ingrid Macdonald and Angela ValenzaDespite high level donor commitments to the humanitarian principles, global humanitarian funding continues to favour politically strategic countries over neglected or protracted crises. This report looks beyond the rhetoric and makes concrete recommendations to make humanitarian funding more principled and effective.
-
Continuity, change and contest: meanings of ‘humanitarian’ from the ‘Religion of Humanity’ to the Kosovo war
Katherine DaviesThis HPG working paper examines the evolving meaning of the term ‘humanitarian’, from its emergence in the mid-nineteenth century through to the end of the twentieth century. -
Talking to the other side: Humanitarian engagement with armed non-state actors
This HPG Policy Brief explores the obstacles to and opportunities for humanitarian dialogue with armed non-state actors (ANSAs). It begins with the rationale for such engagement and the applicable legal frameworks. It then provides an overview of the challenges that humanitarian actors face when engaging in dialogue with ANSAs on issues of access, assistance and protection. -
Somalia conference needs to clear the way for effective relief efforts
'It is, therefore, imperative, irrespective of the direction taken at [the London] conference [on Somalia], that the political community takes heed of these concerns and commits to ensuring that all sides of the conflict adhere to international humanitarian and human rights law, and that the neutral and independent character of humanitarian relief is both supported and respected.' -

Members of the militant Al-shabab in southern Somalia
License: Creative Commons
Credit: Hassan Mahamud Ahmed/IRIN
Source: IRINCounter-terrorism and humanitarian action
This event launches the publication of new HPG research documenting the profound effects that counter-terrorism legislation has on humanitarian action. The authors discuss how the application of counter-terrorism laws undermine humanitarian principles and erode the ability to provide assistance in a neutral and principled manner.
-

Durum. Dissemination session to JEM (Justice and Equality Movement) combatants.
Durum. Dissemination session to JEM (Justice and Equality Movement) combatants.
License: ODI given rights
Credit: CICR/HEGER, Boris
Source: ICRCHumanitarian negotiations with armed non-state actors
This project aims to better understand how aid agencies engage with ANSAs, and how humanitarian engagement ultimately affects access to protection and assistance for vulnerable populations. It will seek to examine various issues and country case studies that illuminate this engagement in difficult political and security environments. This includes what lessons can be learned from experiences of negotiations and dialogue with ANSAs to ensure that vulnerable populations are better able to access assistance and protection. It will also explore the risks inherent to this engagement, including the moral dilemmas that often arise and the compromises that agencies make in order to gain access. -
Praise for ‘the cowboys’ on World Humanitarian Day
Today is the second annual World Humanitarian Day. The day aims to increase public awareness about humanitarian work and the importance of international cooperation, to honour humanitarian workers in the field , and commemorate all of those who have lost their lives in the line course of duty. -
Eroding humanitarian principles: who’s to blame?
Samir ElhawaryIn this blog, important questions with regard to the relevance of applying humanitarian principles in the current environment are raised.
-
Humanitarian advocacy in Darfur: the challenge of neutrality
Sorcha O'CallaghanThis paper argues that the strict notion of the neutrality of humanitarian actors has been eroded in recent years, and that more discussion and evaluation of the role of advocacy, and its effectiveness in humanitarian action, is required. -
Terms of Engagement: Conditions and Conditionality in Humanitarian Action
Nicholas Leader and Joanna MacraeThis report covers a conference organised by the ODI and the Henry Dunant Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue in Geneva in May 2000 to discuss different views on the 'terms of engagement' between humanitarian and political actors. It provides an overview of the debates, and indicates areas of consensus, and of disagreement.











