|
SWOT
analysis is a classic strategic planning tool. Using a framework
of internal strengths and weaknesses and external opportunities
and threats, it provides a simple way to assess how a strategy can
best be implemented. The tool helps planners be realistic about
what they can achieve, and where they should focus.
Detailed Outline of the Process
The SWOT framework - a two-by-two matrix - is best completed in
a group with key members of the team or organisation present. First
it is important to be clear what the policy change objective is,
and what team or organisation the analysis is being carried out
on. Once these are clarified and agreed, begin with a brainstorm
of ideas, and then hone them down and clarify them afterwards in
discussion.
An assessment of internal capacity helps identify where
the project or organisation is now: the existing resources that
can be used immediately and current problems that won't go away.
It can help identify where new resources, skills or allies will
be needed. When thinking of strengths it is useful to think of real
examples of success to ground and clarify the conversation.
Typical focus questions to help think through these issues might
include:
- What type of policy influence does our organisation / project
currently do best? Where have we had the most success?
- What types of policy influencing skills and capacities do we
have?
- In what areas have our staff used them most effectively?
- Who are our strongest allies in policy influence?
- When have they worked with us to create policy impact?
- What do staff consider to be our main strengths and weaknesses?
Why is this? What opinions do others outside the organisation
hold?
An assessment of the external environment tends to focus
on what is going on outside the organisation, or areas which are
not yet affecting the strategy but could do - either positively
or negatively.
The grid above summarises some of the subject areas that might
need considering under both internal and external factors. These
can be used as topic headings if working in small break-out groups
(a good idea if your group is larger than about eight).
Back in plenary it is often useful to rate or rank the most important
strengths and weaknesses (perhaps with symbols: ++, + and 0). In
a larger group participants might like to assign their own scores,
perhaps by assigning sticky dots. The results can then be discussed
and debated.
It is important to keep an eye on possible actions or solutions
that emerge and round up with an action-oriented discussion. How
can our group build on strengths to further our aim and strategy?
What can be included in the strategy to minimise our weakness? And
so on.
The SWOT analysis is a versatile tool that can be returned to at
many different stages of a project; to structure a review or provide
a warm-up discussion before forward planning. It can be applied
broadly, or a small sub-component of the strategy can be singled
out for detailed analysis. The SWOT often forms a useful complement
to a stakeholder analysis. Both are good precursors to Force
Field Analysis and Influence
Mapping.
A Good Example
The example below shows a possible analysis for a small, start-up
NGO considering how to use its new research study to influence government.
Example of SWOT analysis for small NGO
Strengths:
- We are able to follow-up on this research as the current
small amount of work means we have plenty of time
- Our lead researcher has strong reputation within the policy
community
- Our organisation's director has good links to the Ministry
|
Weaknesses:
- Our organisation has little reputation in other parts
of government
- We have a small staff with a shallow skills base in many
areas
- We are vulnerable to vital staff being sick, leaving,
etc
|
Opportunities:
- We are working on a topical issue
- The government claims to want to listen to the voice of
local NGOs
- Other NGOs from our region will support us
|
Threats:
- Will the report be too politically sensitive and threaten
funding from sponsors?
- There is a pool of counter-evidence that could be used
to discredit our research and therefore our organisation.
|
The NGO might therefore decide, amongst other things, to target
the report to specific patrons in the one ministry, use their lead
researcher to bring credibility to the findings and work on building
up a regional coalition on the issue.
Further Information
View this as pdf
(
133kb)
Back to Tools for Policy Impact index
|