|
Summary and Preliminary Conclusions
Although the idea that policy should be informed by evidence is
not new, the current emphasis on EBP is. We have highlighted some
of the issues and challenges regarding how evidence is and should
be incorporated into policymaking. It is important to acknowledge
that evidence is but one of many factors that influence policy processes.
Policymaking is inherently political (Nutley, 2003: 3). This is
true of the developed as well as the developing world. The realities
of policy decisions are less about projected consequences and more
about process and legitimation; 'The policy process is characterised
by competition over agenda setting, over jurisdictions, and over
interpretations' (Young et al, 2002). Against this backdrop, the
EBP approach seeks to create a sustainable and transferable impact.
There are lots of different stages to the policymaking process
and at each juncture different evidence is needed. Therefore evidence
does not merely enter the policymaking process at one point. The
challenge is to analyse the conditions that facilitate evidence-informed
policymaking (Nutley, 2003) and translate these conditions into
practical tools for the governments of developing countries. Despite
the challenges to creating an EBP approach, there is a general consensus
that a more evidence-based approach to policy would be a positive
development.
We have also identified some important considerations. It is clear
from the literature that:
- policy should be informed by a wide breadth of evidence, not
just hard research. Key issues include the quality, credibility,
relevance and the cost of the policy;
- evidence is needed, and in different ways, at a number of different
points of the policy cycle;
- time constraints will affect the mechanisms available to mobilize
evidence - urgent issues require different approaches than processes
to develop strategic policy directions.
This paper continues by suggesting a number of tools which can
be used to make policy more evidence based. The tools are presented
on the assumption that the reader is a progressive policymaker in
a developing country, who is interested in developing policy which
is more evidence based. Undoubtedly the development arena is distinct
and therefore there are a number of reasons why the tools are not
directly transferable. This is a work in progress and thus this
is only a preliminary version of a paper, which is likely to change
and develop based on comment and further testing.
Back to project index
|