Research and Policy in Development (RAPID)

Areas of focus - Understanding the role of knowledge in policy and practice

There are many factors that influence the ability for research to inform both policy and practice. Expanding upon the RAPID framework – which looked at the role of political and external context, evidence and links – the RAPID team have focussed current work on five main areas that may contribute to or limit the ability for knowledge to play a role in policy and practice.

If you'd like to find out more about RAPID's research activities, please contact Nicola Jones.

Context >

Maasai outside a Kenyan factory	Flickr	irvinepmichaelca	http://www.flickr.com/photos/michael_irvine/

Context is one of the most influential factors in determining the importance attached to evidence in social and policy spaces.

Sectoral dynamics >

Handmade paper umbrellas for sale in Luang Prabang's night market	Flickr	Lorna87	http://www.flickr.com/photos/lorna87/362000101/

Understanding how the relationship between knowledge and policy-making varies according to the nature of the sector is critical for designing appropriate knowledge translation and uptake strategies.

Actors >

Young entrepreneurs visiting a favela Hummingbird Youth Capacity Building Programme, Brazil	Flickr	Children at Risk Foundation – CARF Brazil

Policy actors have different abilities to critically engage with knowledge and face varying opportunities and challenges when bringing evidence to the table during policy discussions.

Innovative frameworks >

Blown glass swirls in green and yellow	Flickr	alexdecarvalho	http://www.flickr.com/photos/adc/411821495/

RAPID recognises the value of engaging with a wide range of analytical approaches to influencing policy and practice, including the RAPID framework, complexity theory and innovation systems.

Types of knowledge >

Gambian school child writes on blackboard	Flickr	h2oalchemist	http://www.flickr.com/photos/h2oalchemist/414924312/

How knowledge is generated is just as important as what is made of it. What types of information – scientific, participatory, or monitoring and evaluation data – are influential in policy dialogues in different sectors and at different policy levels?