If this email does not display correctly, please visit: http://www.odi.org.uk/media_resources/newsreleases/2007/250607.htm

ODI Logo

Overseas Development Institute

News Release

Where are the political divides on international
development?


25 June, 2007
For immediate release


With Gordon Brown about to take office, the Overseas Development Institute (ODI) and All Party Parliamentary Group on Overseas Development (APGOOD) convened a series of three public meetings at which representatives from each of the three political parties were invited to give their own perspectives on ‘What’s next in international development?’

Gareth Thomas MP, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for International Development spoke for Labour; Andrew Mitchell MP, Shadow Secretary of State for International Development, spoke for the Conservatives; together with Lynne Featherstone MP, the Liberal Democrat Spokesperson on International Development.

A new ODI blog by ODI Director Simon Maxwell summarises the three perspectives, assesses their similarities and differences, and draws some conclusions about the possible future direction of UK international development policy.

Simon Maxwell says:

‘These three speeches tell us something about the issues that will shape political debate in the months to come. There is a strong cross-party consensus on the importance of international development, [and] on the view that aid is not enough on its own. All three speakers discussed issues like trade, conflict, climate change and migration. There are however, some differences of emphasis in how much prominence is given to these various issues.

‘Aid effectiveness looks likely to be an important battle-ground, especially if public expenditure is constrained in coming years so that aid is increasing as other areas are being cut. Corruption is another topic where, as Andrew Mitchell put it, other parties will “go further” than the Government. Lynne Featherstone’s remarks on this topic suggested that she would agree. There was an interesting difference of emphasis on the role of governments. Gareth Thomas was emphatic that only Governments could underwrite service provision, and was sceptical of the view that NGOs could take on this job.’

(ENDS)



Notes for Editors

1. Written summaries, audio files and speeches (where available) for each of the three political perspectives can be found on the ODI website at:
http://www.odi.org.uk/speeches/apgood/international_development/index.html

2. The new ODI blog by Simon Maxwell, entitled ‘Where are the political divides on international development?’ can be found on the ODI website at:
http://blogs.odi.org.uk/blogs/main/archive/2007/06/22/3335.aspx

3. Simon Maxwell and other ODI researchers are available for interview, comment or background briefing about the future of UK international development policy. Please contact Anna Tublin, ODI Media and Events Officer, on tel: +44 (0)20 7922 0419 or email: a.tublin@odi.org.uk

4. ODI is Britain’s leading independent think-tank on international development and humanitarian issues. Its mission is to inspire and inform policy and practice which lead to the reduction of poverty, the alleviation of suffering and the achievement of sustainable livelihoods in developing countries. Locking together high-quality applied research, practical policy advice and policy-focused dissemination and debate, ODI works with partners in the public and private sectors, in both developing and developed countries. Further details can be found on the ODI website: www.odi.org.uk



This message has been sent to: {Email} because you are on our news release email list. If you would like to be removed, please send an email with 'unsubscribe' in the subject line to: media@odi.org.uk or {UNSUBSCRIBEHYPERLINK}.


Overseas Development Institute
111 Westminster Bridge Road, London SE1 7JD, UK
Tel: +44 (0)20 7922 0300 | Fax: +44 (0)20 7922 0399
Email: media@odi.org.uk | Web: www.odi.org.uk

Registered charity number 228248