| Good
Humanitarian Donorship: history of the initiative and HPG
engagement with it
The Good Humanitarian Donorship initiative
was launched in June 2003 at an international meeting which involved
representatives
of donor governments, UN agencies, the International Red Cross
and Red Crescent Movement and other organisations involved in humanitarian
action. Government and ECHO representatives at the meeting endorsed
Principles
and Good Practice of Humanitarian Donorship which set
out commonly agreed objectives for, and a definition of, humanitarian
action, as well as a set of guiding principles and good practice
examples of official donorship.
The recognition that official humanitarian
assistance constitutes a distinctive subset of aid policy in donor
governments is an historic
shift — particularly at a time of increasing trends towards
integrating security and aid policy overall. A total of 22 donors
now participate in the initiative and several are progressing implementation
plans at the domestic level. In addition, OECD DAC members endorsed
GHD at the Ministerial level in April 2006.
The UK and Denmark currently
co-chair the initiative, and convene ad hoc meetings of GHD donor
representatives to progress implementation
of pilot approaches and dialogue through multilateral fora. A web-site
has been established which posts regular updates of progress, and
provides a comprehensive list of resources. Click
here to access
it.
HPG’s work on GHD
HPG has played
an active role in engaging with the GHD process throughout its
evolution. The initiative itself and its main conclusions
were significantly influenced by the findings of a series of HPG
studies. More recent work has involved reviewing progress and has
explored the current obstacles to translating GHD commitments into
widespread behavioural change among donors. Drawing heavily on
lessons from donor efforts to implement the Rome and Paris declarations
on aid effectiveness, HPG’s most recent paper considers the
extent to which efforts to provide guidance and measure performance
through the GHD initiative have succeeded in overcoming common
obstacles to implementation. This work has also devised an enhanced
performance measurement framework designed to assist in clarifying
responsibilities and roles, strengthening guidance for donor staff
and enhancing monitoring and evaluation. It has also made recommendations
for donors and humanitarian agencies to strengthen and improve
overall engagement with GHD.
All key documents are available to
download from the right hand side panel. If you would like to contact
the project team please
email Sue Graves, Victoria
Wheeler or Adele Harmer.
|
REUTERS/David Gray, courtesy www.alertnet.org. |
| Key
publications |
Latest:
Sue
Graves and Victoria Wheeler, Good
Humanitarian Donorship: overcoming obstacles to improved
collective donor
performance, HPG Discussion Paper, December 2006
Jonathan
Pickering, Good Humanitarian
Donorship Principles and Good Practice: a summary of indicators
and
interpretations of good practice, HPG Background Paper, March
2006
Previous Work:
Influencing GHD outcomes
Joanna
Macrae et al., Uncertain
power: the changing role of official donors in humanitarian
action, HPG Report
12, December 2002
James
Darcy and Charles-Antoine Hofmann, According
to Need? Needs Assessment and Decision-Making in the Humanitarian
Sector, HPG Report 15, September 2003.
Reviewing progress
Adele
Harmer and Lin Cotterrell, From
Stockholm to Ottawa: a progress review of the Good Humanitarian
Donorship
initiative, HPG Briefing Paper 18, September 2005
Adele
Harmer and Abby Stoddard (Centre on International Cooperation),
Review
of Good Humanitarian Donorship domestic strategies, Commissioned Report for the Canadian Government
published in advance of the 3rd International Meeting on
GHD in July 2005.
Joanna
Macrae and Adele Harmer, Good
humanitarian donorship and the European Union: Issues and
options, Commissioned Report for the Government of Ireland
published in advance of an informal meeting of the Humanitarian
Aid
Committee, Dublin 25-26th March 2004.
|
|
|