Neil has over twenty five years experience working in international development, initially as a technical adviser on tropical forest management, a research manager of natural resource management programmes and now a policy researcher at ODI.Neil's present research focuses on international environmental policy, the evolving aid architecture and its relation to climate finance. At the national level, Neil's research interests include national budgetary processes, sector policies and the institutional development of environmental agencies.Governance has been a long-standing theme in much of Neil's work. He has been involved in a number of studies that have examined transparency and accountability in decision-making within the forest sector.Neil trained as a forester. Prior to joining ODI, he worked within several forest departments, most recently in Guyana (1999 to 2002) and prior to that in Belize (1992 to 1998) and Ghana (1988 to 1991).
|
Opinion Papers
|
 |
The REDD road to Copenhagen: Readiness for what?
ODI Opinion 118
|
|
This Opinion points out that REDD is attractive in three ways: the potential for mitigation of climate change, the conservation of biodiversity and from a development perspective. However, the Opinion concludes that REDD readiness requires an understanding first the social, institutional and political conditions that drive land use change and that often operate beyond the forest sector at local, national and international scales. Efforts to deliver an abatement mechanism should wait until there is increased confidence that these drivers can be countered in ways that are both developmentally sound and socially just.
|
|
Neil Bird and David Brown
|
|
November 2008
|
|
|
Recent bilateral initiatives for climate financing: Are they moving in the right direction?
ODI Opinion 112
|
|
Governments worldwide are debating how best to respond to the many challenges set by climate change. Within this debate there is growing recognition that national funding efforts need to be complemented by additional finance at the international level.
|
|
Neil Bird
|
|
September 2008
|
|
|
MDGs and the environment: Are environmental institutions 'fit for purpose'?
ODI Opinion 110
|
Millennium Development Goal 7 is, simply put: ‘to ensure environmental
sustainability’. Local efforts on environmental sustainability are linked intimately to global commitments. Achieving this goal, therefore, depends heavily on action at both the national and international level. The role of the national government administration, in particular, is critical to the delivery of environmental results. The question to be asked is whether these government institutions are ‘fit for purpose’?
|
|
Neil Bird
|
|
September 2008
|
|
|
| |
|
Briefing Papers
and Natural Resource Perspectives |
 |
Changing aid delivery and the environment
ODI Briefing Paper 17
|
|
This paper examines how environmental objectives are pursued by donors in a context where aid delivery mechanisms are changing, asking how donor support can best be delivered to meet environmental objectives.
|
|
Neil Bird and Lidia Cabral
|
|
March 2007
|
|
|
New Technologies in support of Forest Governance: factors influencing success
VERIFOR Briefing Paper 7
|
|
This paper examines how new technologies are being introduced as a means to strengthen national forest governance systems, taking the example of Brazil where their uptake is advancing rapidly. Some key elements to consider when contemplating the introduction of new technologies are described.
|
|
Neil Bird and Hans Thiel
|
|
Feb 2007
|
|
|
Convergence between Certification and Verification in the drive to Legality
Assurance: assessing the pros and cons
VERIFOR Briefing Paper 6
|
|
This paper examines how new technologies are being introduced as a means to strengthen national forest governance systems, taking the example of Brazil where their uptake is advancing rapidly. Some key elements to consider when contemplating the introduction of new technologies are described.
|
|
David Brown and Neil Bird
|
|
Feb 2007
|
|
|
Developmental Impacts of Verification Systems in the Forest Sector
VERIFOR Briefing Paper 3
|
|
Briefing Paper from the VERIFOR Project: Institutional Options for Forest Verification.
|
|
Neil Bird and Kate Schreckenberg
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Public Goods and Private Rights: the Illegal Logging Debate and the Rights of the Poor
ODI Forestry Briefing 9
|
|
This briefing paper applies a rights perspective to understanding legal and institutional reform of the tropical forest sector. The sector is characterised by strongly competing interests, and massive differences in the power of stakeholders to influence the application of the law. The regulatory regime governing the sector often discriminates against the poor. This is of particular concern in the context of donor- and industry-led initiatives to combat illegal logging. Upholding legal frameworks which already fail to accommodate local rights could compound injustices. A rights perspective focuses attention on the channels by which the poor can contest and uphold their claims in the face of national and international interests in the forest sector.
|
|
David Brown, Adrian Wells, Cecilia Luttrell and Neil Bird
|
|
February 2006
|
|
|
Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers: making the case for forestry
ODI Forestry Briefing 7
|
|
This paper argues that forestry coverage is limited within most Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers. There is also little exploration of the links between poverty reduction strategies and sector processes, such as national forest programmes. It is therefore unlikely that forestry issues will appear high on the national political agenda, which is now much influenced by the poverty reduction debate. This may affect budgetary allocations to the sector, and reduce the opportunities for cross-sectoral coordination. The contribution that forestry can make to poverty reduction has to be better understood and then communicated effectively in national policy circles. Sustainable forest management can probably play only a minor role in a growth-orientated, nationally accountable poverty reduction strategy. Yet through tenurial reform forests have the potential to provide significant, long lasting benefits for the rural poor.
|
|
Neil Bird and and Chris Dickson
|
|
March 2005
|
|
|
| |
|
Background Notes |
 |
Recent international trade patterns in timber products for the Verifor case study countries
VERIFOR Information Note
|
|
A major driver behind the development of national verification systems is the expectation that exported timber may soon have to demonstrate that it has been produced in compliance with the laws of the producer country. For example, this is a key element of the Voluntary Partnership Agreements (VPAs) being developed under the EU’s FLEGT Action Plan. The nature of timber product exports is therefore likely to be a key determinant of how different producer countries move forward this reform agenda. The twelve Verifor country case studies encompass a wide range of situations, with different levels of exports, different key markets and differing recent trends evident. This note examines trade across these countries, to help understand the different stages of legal verification to be found in each country.
|
|
Neil Bird
|
|
December 2007
|
|
|
Human Rights and Poverty Reduction. Public goods and private rights: The illegal logging debate and the rights of the poor
Rights in Action Background Paper
|
|
Public goods and private rights:
The illegal logging debate and the rights of the poor
|
|
David Brown, Adrian Wells, Cecilia Luttrell and Neil Bird
|
|
March 2005
|
|
|
Ghana's Experience in Timber Verification System Design
VERIFOR case study
|
|
Case study from the VERIFOR Project: Institutional Options for Forest Verification
|
|
Neil Bird, Timothée Fometé and Gene Birikorang
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Key Sheet No. 17
|
|
National forest programmes (nfps) are a globally adopted framework for forest policy, planning and implementation at the country level.
|
|
Neil Bird
|
|
November 2002
|
|
|
| |
|
Others |
 |
Government institutions, public expenditure and the role of development partners: meeting Kenya’s environmental challenges
Final Report
|
|
The purpose of the study is to analyse and document experience in transferring environmental policy priorities from national plans to budgets, and through into government implementation programmes. In addition, the study discusses how donors can facilitate and support such processes in the context of growing interest in programmatic support.
|
|
Neil Bird and Njeru Kirira
|
|
April 2009
|
|
|
New Global Environmental Funds
Report
|
|
This paper begins by describing the existing architecture with regard to international funding for environmental actions, focusing on two pre-eminent institutions within this architecture: the Global Environment Facility (GEF) and the World Bank. The desire to achieve more immediate impacts is a major driving force behind the donor countries’ interest in creating new funding mechanisms, as first signaled at the 2005 G-8 Summit meeting in Gleneagles – and likely to be repeated at the 2008 G-8 meeting in Hokkaido Toyako. The document reviews eight new bilateral funds and six multilateral funds established to address the challenges related to climate change. Each of these new funding initiatives is described, focusing on three characteristics: (i) stated objectives; (ii) means of financing and disbursement; and (iii) aspects of fund governance. This latter aspect is a key concern, taking into account the considerable sensitivity associated with the way funds will be controlled and disbursed.
|
|
Gareth Porter, Neil Bird, Nanki Kaur and Leo Peskett
|
|
July 2008
|
|
|
Goverment institutions, public expenditure and the role of development partners: meeting the new environmental challenges of the developing world
Report
|
|
Final report from the 'Budget support, aid instruments and the environment - The country context' study, which examines the linkages between environmental policies and outcomes, public expenditure on the environment and the influence of different modalities of development cooperation.
|
|
Andrew Lawson and Neil Bird
|
|
March 2008
|
|
|
Papua New Guinea Forest Studies
Reports
|
|
History of the Forestry Sector
Examines the development of the forest sector from Independence (in 1975) to the present. It explores the way the sector has evolved, and identifies a tension between the customary ownership of forests and the State's view of forests as a national resource.
The current legal and institutional framework of the sector
Reviews the current legal and institutional framework governing the administration of the forest sector in Papua New Guinea. From the evidence examined, the review concludes that the main requirements for reform at this stage concern fulfilment by the state of its responsibilities.
Issues and opportunities for the Forestry Sector
Looks at the economic case for forestry in Papua New Guinea. In broad societal terms the importance of the sector lies in its development potential of bringing incomes, jobs, infrastructure and services to remote rural areas.
|
|
Neil Bird, Adrian Wells, Flip van Helden, Ruth Turia
|
|
January 2007
|
|
|
Addressing Environmental Objectives in the Context of Budget Support
Report
|
|
A report from Neil's recent project, asking which aid instruments are best suited to promote environmental management that contributes to poverty reduction and development, and under which circumstances?
|
|
Neil Bird
|
|
2006
|
|
|
| |
| Current projects |
 |
|
European development policy and climate change
|
|
CCEF is part of a European wide consortium aiming to improve EU policy-makers and other societal sectors' shared understanding of emerging challenges facing EU development policy and external action.
|
|
Leo Peskett, Natasha Grist, Neil Bird and David Brown
|
|
April 2008 - October 2010
|
|
Working paper on sector approaches in the Environment and Natural Resources Sector (ENR)
|
|
The objective of the study is to develop a Reference Document which helps the EC as well as other donors to: understand the main features and challenges of sector-wide approach in the ENR sector, assess ENR sector programmes, design and implement support to ENR sector programmes.
|
|
Neil Bird
|
|
June - December 2009
|
|
Financing Climate Change to Support Mitigation and Adaptation Actions in Africa: Key Issues and Option for Policies in Negotiations
|
|
The objective of this study is to prepare a paper that provides an objective analysis of financing mechanisms and initiatives on climate change, as they relate to the specific circumstances and needs of Africa to meet its mitigation and adaptation needs and objectives.
|
|
Neil Bird and Jessica Brown
|
|
April 2009 - June 2009
|
|
Climate Funds Update
|
|
This study seeks to update research for an existing Boll-ODI-WWFUS study on new cliamte finance instruments as the basis for creating and managing a public access website with a database of a select and agreed upon group of bilateral and multilateral cliamte funds.
|
|
Neil Bird and Jessica Brown
|
|
December 2008 - February 2009
|
|
VERIFOR: Institutional Options for Verifying Legality in the Forest Sector
|
|
VERIFOR is concerned with the policy, institutional and legal challenges around the issue of illegal logging. It seeks to help tropical producer countries verify that their timber has been legally harvested.
|
|
David Brown, Cecilia Luttrell, Adrian Wells, Neil Bird, Kate Schreckenberg
|
|
February 2005 - January 2009
|
|
The Poverty-Forests Toolkit: showing what forests mean to the poor
|
|
Forestry often has a low profile within national policies and strategies for poverty reduction because the contribution of forest products and services to rural livelihoods is not sufficiently understood. The Poverty-Forests Toolkit aims to address this gap.
|
|
Neil Bird
|
|
February 2007-June 2008
|
| |
| Completed projects |
 |
|
Budget Support, Aid Instruments and the Environment – the Kenyan Context
|
|
The purpose of this country study for Kenya is basically to add a fifth country to the analytical work prepared by ODI (see the Budget Support, Aid Instruments and the Environment study) as well as provide specific information for the process of formulating the next phase of Danish Environmental Sector Programme Support for Kenya.
|
|
Neil Bird
|
|
June 2008 - April 2009
|
|
Environmental sustainability within the new development agenda: opportunities and challenges for the civil society
|
|
The purpose of this study is to identify the tools that environmental civil society organisations can deploy and the policy positions they can promote in the post-Paris development agenda to ensure that long-term environmental impacts in developing countries benefit both poor people and the environment.
|
|
Neil Bird
|
|
July - October 2008
|
|
Development co-operation and climate change adaptation
|
|
Guidelines on how to incorporate climate change adaptation into development co-operation are currently being prepared and will provide guidance to both development partners and national governments in developing countries on how to incorporate climate change adaptation concerns into policy and development operations.
|
|
Neil Bird and Lidia Cabral
|
|
February - May 2008
|
|
New Global Environmental Funds
|
|
The purpose of this study is to obtain all pertinent information and to present an analysis of recent developments and trends in global environmental finance.
|
|
Neil Bird and Leo Peskett
|
|
February - June 2008
|
|
Public environmental expenditure within multi-year budgetary frameworks
|
|
This study, undertaken with the OECD Environment Directorate, examines how multi-year budgetary processes work in practice in both high income OECD countries ( Australia and the Netherlands) and in aid-receiving countries (Armenia, South Africa and Uganda). A main objective of the study is to identify the opportunities for, and limits to, financing environmental management through general budget support.
|
|
Neil Bird, Geoff Handley and Edward Hedger
|
|
November 2007 – March 2008
|
|
Budget Support, Aid Instruments and the Environment - The country context
|
|
Neil Bird and Cecilia Luttrell, together with ODI researchers Lidia Cabral and Andrew Lawson, will examine country experience of public expenditure on the environment and how this is influenced by development partners. Four country case studies, in Ghana, Mali, Mozambique and Tanzania, will be undertaken and a synthesis report prepared.
|
|
Neil Bird, Cecilia Luttrell, Lidia Cabral and Andrew Lawson
|
|
July 2007 -February 2008
|
|
Forest Sector Studies, Papua New Guinea
|
|
ODI prepared three papers, to be presented at the "Seminar on Trees and Tree Products for the Future of Papua New Guinea" in December 2006: History of the Forest Sector; Audit of the Forest Sector; and Potential of the Forest Sector. The studies form part of a programme aiming to ‘provide a forum for a participatory approach to drawing up a plan for the future of the forestry industry in Papua New Guinea'.
|
|
Neil Bird, Adrian Wells , Flip van Helden and David Brown
|
|
December 2006
|
|
Addressing Environmental Objectives in the Context of Budget Support
|
|
The question that lies at the heart of this study is which aid instruments are best suited to promote environmental management that contributes to poverty reduction and development, and under which circumstances? General Budget Support (GBS) was a response to the dissatisfaction over the effectiveness of earlier aid delivery mechanisms, particularly concern over limited national ownership and resource allocation under project and programme support. Its origins are closely associated with the introduction of Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs) as a focus for collaboration between donors and partner countries.
|
|
Neil Bird, Lidia Cabral, Andrew Lawson and David Brown
|
|
May - December 2006
|
| |