17/11/2004
A diverse range
of suggestions
emerged over the
first days of
the consultation,
including on HIV/AIDS,
the ‘brain
drain’,
women’s
participation,
and the suggestion
that Africa needed
a “revolutionary
shock” to
develop.
For HIV/AIDS,
one contributor
suggested that
more spending
was needed on
palliative care,
including education
and training for
all professionals
working with HIV/AIDS
as well as more
pain control medicine
to improve peoples’
quality of life.
Another contributor
advocated for
a task force which
would identify
situations where
the risk of HIV/AIDS
was high, and
then bring all
parties together
to find a solution.
The contributor
gave a specific
example, suggesting
that although
new nickel and
platinum mine
developments in
Burundi could
pose a risk, social
housing for workers
families’
could be situated
near the mines
to reduce this.
Looking at health
more widely, another
contributor suggested
that the Commission
needed to focus
more on delivery
systems which
“affect
all health problems,
not just those
which have acquired
international
initiatives”.
Turning to the
‘brain drain’
question, one
contributor noted
the success of
one programme
of the ‘International
Organization for
Migration’
that had paid
for experts to
go to Africa,
although it had
been discontinued
due to lack of
funding. She suggested
it was important
to “provide
good opportunities
with adequate
pay for African
technical specialists”.
Another contributor
stressed the need
to develop regional
“centres
of excellence”
to provide specialised
education; somewhat
echoing this,
another contributor
argued that adult
education needed
the same analysis
as primary and
secondary education.
Gender equity
is an issue in
education and
also in participation
across Africa,
however old the
people involved.
One contributor
criticised the
Nigerian ‘Women-in-Agriculture’
programme, with
a clear policy
prescription:
“Don’t
presume and prioritize
our agricultural
production problems
for us”,
adding that there
was need for dialogue
and a willingness
to respond to
requests. Another
contributor appealed
to NGOs and grassroots
organisations
to respond to
the Commission
for Africa’s
consultation(s),
suggesting that
they “nominate
projects that
have made a real
difference to
communities, not
just providing
relief but helping
communities to
regenerate”.
Don’t
presume
and prioritize
our agricultural
production
problems
for us
|
This would, perhaps,
counterbalance
the claim of another
contributor that
“with over
a century of backwardness
Africa is now
thought in the
minds of an average
world citizen
as the needy continent”.
He argued Africa
needed a “revolutionary
shock” –
for example by
considering draconian
measures such
as turning game
parks into manufacturing
zones, limiting
African couples
to have only one
child, gradually
phasing out aid
payments to reduce
dependency, and
inspiring Africans
to look outwards,
for example by
learning languages
used in China
and India. Strong
measures, perhaps,
but what do other
people think?
with
over a century
of backwardness
Africa is
now thought
in the minds
of an average
world citizen
as the needy
continent
|
19/11/2004
Education emerged
as a theme in
which contributors
largely supported
the Commission
for Africa's analysis.
'Provide appropriate
skills' was one
message because,
as one contributor
suggested, "parents
may be dissuaded
from sending their
children to school
unless they see
school as a route
to better employment".
The same contributor
mentioned the
need to support
higher education,
which had already
been noted as
missing in the
Consultation document
earlier in the
e-forum. But another
contributor provided
an example supporting
the Commission's
analysis advocating
"access to
local communities".
Tanzania's Primary
Education Development
Program was cited
as accountable,
robust and flexible.
It involved people
from the grassroots
through school
committees including
"wide community
representatives
who identify,
plan and monitor
activity implementation
and resources
use for the education
projects of their
choice".
 parents
may be dissuaded
from sending
their children
to school
unless they
see it as
a route
to better
employment
|
As in education
as for health,
the suggestion
was to "avoid
vertical programmes
with little sustainability".
Referring to the
Commission's suggestion
for developing
WHO guidelines
with national
health strategies,
one contributor
stressed the need
for "sharing
of information
among the parties
involved, including
governments, government
linked NGOs, and
business oriented
NGOs". Similarly,
with regards to
health provision,
another contributor
highlighted infrastructure
as "the availability
and cost of transport
are major barriers
to the provision
of health care
services in rural
Africa",
including "immunisation,
disease surveillance
and HIV/AIDS education".
Physical access
and access to
information in
both the education
and health sectors
was mentioned
by another contributor,
but specifically
for disabled groups,
where consultation
was vital.
Finally, there
was a comment
on culture: one
contributor berated
the domination,
and imposition,
of European culture
on the continent
(this was seen
as being most
pervasive in South
Africa). Suggested
solutions included
"accelerating
the documentation
of African knowledge
systems"
and "encouraging
the use of African
knowledge for
African libraries"
accessible to
all Africans,
not just an elite.
"Africans
are tired of being
trained in their
own countries
to be pseudo-Europeans".
 the
availability
and cost
of transport
are major
barriers
to the provision
of health
care services
in rural
Africa
|
However, what
role can the diaspora
play? And hasn’t
the renaissance
of the African
Union had a major
part to play in
developing “African
dignity, well
being and prosperity”?
These are unanswered
questions in the
‘culture
and the arts’
sub-topic. Further
contributions
would also be
particularly welcome
in the ‘migration
and urbanisation’
and ‘participation’
sub-topics.
22/11/2004
Contributors
took a critical
view of Africa’s
relationship with
the west. “African
governments are
not responsible
to their citizens,
rather to western
institutions like
the IMF and the
World Bank”
was one perspective;
another contributor
said “The
G8 governments
need to live up
to their aid commitments”.
 African
governments
are not
responsible
to their
citizens,
rather to
western
institutions
like the
IMF and
the World
Bank
|
Some examples
of problems in
Africa were given:
a situation in
which there was
a failure to distribute
mosquito nets
to prevent malaria;
delayed funding
of the Global
Fund to fight
Aids, TB and Malaria;
and the inadequacy
of educational
materials available
to teachers and
students. In some
cases this was
due to a lack
of consistency,
a failure of “social
marketing”,
or a lack of "real
and serious political
will" among
western and African
governments.
One participant
suggested that
aid needed to
be delivered strategically
in consultation
with “recipient
governments, civil
society and the
research community”
and “not
just all bundled
together as budget
support”.
But, conversely,
it could be argued
that a move back
to projectised
aid might risk
dispersing and
fragment the effects
of development.
Poverty Reduction
Strategy Papers
(PRSPs) have engaged
civil society
around budgeted
spending –
although how useful
have these been?
It should be
noted that the
Commission for
Africa’s
consultation document
suggests the need
to “encourage
all donors to
structure their
work to fit in
with Africa’s
culture”.
Nevertheless,
one contributor
highlighted poverty,
something which
affects all spheres
of life, “whether
in governance,
culture, or education”
– as “most
African parents’
daily concern
is how to feed
their children”.
Another contributor
noted however,
“better
educated adults
result in better
educated children”,
and pointed out
that adult education
“embraces
community education,
work based education
and public (e.g.
health) education”.
It was even a
“resource
for ensuring the
appropriate revival
and relevant use
of indigenous
knowledge”.
 better
educated
adults result
in better
educated
children
|
23/11/2004
The Commission’s
consultation document
suggests “culture
is taken into
account across
the Commission’s
areas of action”.
Culture has been
a central theme
over the last
day of discussions.
The consultation
document also
advocates “greater
community participation,
including by women
and young people,
in shaping donor
policies”.
One contributor
gave an example
of this by telling
a story: a well-meaning
person had decided
to build a school
for a community
but found afterwards
that better water
and sanitation
was the thing
that was really
wanted. Differences
in perceptions,
understanding
and philosophy
are central here.
With regard to
this, one contributor
noted two very
different approaches
in agriculture.
Western practice
has principally
aimed for “highest
productivity per
unit” whereas
the traditional
African view has
assumed the most
important thing
is “social
resilience in
the face of frequent
climate change”.
In terms of different
philosophies,
thought, and cultural
practices, another
contributor suggested
that in the past
colonial and missionary
zeal had tried
to “kill
the cockroach
using a bulldozer
but killed the
gentle dove”
in the process.
But was the cockroach
really dead, and
could the dove
be resurrected?
The same contributor
advocated for
Africans drawing
more on African
philosophers,
citing Ifa Corpus
as an example.
Many contributors
were opposed to
“one-size-fits-all
thinking”,
and the nature
and breadth of
culture was much
discussed. Within
Africa, it was
noted that there
were many hundreds
of local cultures.
While the “traditional”
view of culture
was important,
at the same time
culture was seen
as something “fluid,
heterogeneous
and ever-changing”;
“cultures
are only alive
when they are
in flux”.
One contributor
from Grand-Yoff
in Dakar, Senegal,
mentioned the
importance of
“unformal”
local knowledge
which needed protection
against the “road
roller of universalisation”
of the logic of
western thought.
 cultures
are only
alive when
they are
in flux
|
The importance
of cultural industries
was discussed,
with one contributor
expressing disappointment
that the development
sector did not
support them for
their “contribution
to economic growth
…, social
capital, civil
participation
and well-being
across Africa”.
She added that
“development
without culture
is ‘growth
without a soul’”:
“we need
to start incorporating
cultural mapping
and cultural impact
assessment into
African development
processes”.
Other contributors
stressed the “value
and significance
of music”
and “theatre
as one of the
most effective
methods of engaging
with the shifting
layers of change
that are the lifeblood
of culture”.
 we
need to
start incorporating
cultural
mapping
and cultural
impact assessment
into African
development
processes
|
Separately, a
key unanswered
question about
migration and
urbanisation was
examined by one
contributor. Surveys
and polls “have
demonstrated that
Africans have
extremely highly
aspirations for
mobility outside
[their] country
(or continent)
of origin. This
exists despite
high levels of
pride in being
African. We have
to question what
makes people want
to leave their
homes.”
Does anyone have
an answer to this?
 Africans
have extremely
highly aspirations
for mobility
outside
[their]
country
(or continent)
of origin
... We have
to question
what makes
people want
to leave
their homes
|
Finally, to effectively
develop the capacity
of African governments,
another contributor
stated the need
for more “research
to inform policy
makers/decision
makers”,
“monitoring
and evaluation”,
development of
banks of “best
practices”
and “knowledge
transfer and sharing”.
It is difficult
to criticise such
suggestions, but
how could they
be practically
achieved? What
are the priorities,
and are there
any good examples
of where governments
have done this
effectively?
25/11/2004
“Culture,
communication
and participation
in the development
domain cannot
be untied or separated
from each other”
was a clear message
from one of a
further series
of contributors
coming via the
Creative Exchange
network (see http://www.creativexchange.org/).
Many messages
continued to explore
and define culture
– the arts
and theatre were
mentioned again,
but culture was
also cited in
its broader context
in relation to
‘land’
(and land redistribution)
and ‘representative
democracy’
(or its absence)
in Africa. One
contributor noted
the “undervaluation
and low status
accorded to African
ingenuity, culture
and its many symbolic
representations
(music, dance,
theatre visual
arts etc)”
and the lack of
negotiating power
that Africa has
in relation to
international
trade. Another
contributor observed
that even though
global trade in
cultural goods
was increasing,
Africa was (yet
again) unable
to fully benefit.
Culture,
communication
and participation
in the development
domain cannot
be untied
or separated
from each
other
|
“Participation,
participation
and participation”
was the solution
advocated by one
contributor. There
were several calls
for involving
whole communities,
giving a “voice
for the voiceless”
and to those traditionally
‘seen but
not heard’
(e.g. youth, women,
and the disabled).
Affirmative action
and making gender
a cross-cutting
theme were cited
as ways to improve
women’s
rights. Outside
of Africa, it
was suggested
developed nations
should get more
involved in African
issues and, equally,
Africans should
be more accepting
of new and external
ideas.
One participant
noted that the
electronic nature
of this consultation
excluded a huge
number of Africans.
Other contributors
suggested measures
needed to be taken
to make information
and communication
technology (ICT)
more widely available
in Africa, possibly
a role the diaspora
could help with.
“It is only
when Africans
themselves substantially
invest in Africa
that others will
follow”
was the challenge
set down by one
contributor, who
added “the
best of Africa’s
intellectual capital
is outside of
the continent.”
Another African
contributor stated
that “the
developed and
educated Africans
have a responsibility
to make sure we
have incorporated
the views of those
Africans whom
we think we are
working on behalf
of”.
It
is only
when Africans
themselves
substantially
invest in
Africa that
others will
follow
|
The responsibility
of governments
and international
institutions was
also mentioned.
One contributor
described a situation
in Mozambique
where a draft
national strategy
to combat HIV/AIDS
had been developed
through a year
of consultations,
but was subsequently
rejected by the
National AIDS
Council and UNICEF
as the “participatory
and culturally
sensitive approach
was not what they
had in mind”.
This was a lesson
too for NGOs,
criticised for
adopting new jargon
around participation
but failing to
live up to it
in practice. Was
the principle
motivation therefore
simply a desire
for wanting “more
institutional
visibility through
mass media”?
The wider question
of ideas, their
implementation,
and perpetuation
of power relations
was raised by
another contributor,
suggesting that
too often ‘alien’
ideas were transplanted
into already unequal
local hierarchies.
Separately, some
specific suggestions
for education
and research emerged.
At primary and
secondary level,
it was noted “Child-to-child
teaching is a
very efficient
and cost-effective
means to educate
large numbers
of children and
in particular
girls”.
At high levels,
“More vocational
and technical
training centres”,
“socially
responsive science
and technology”,
and “demand-led
research”
were suggested.
African universities
should be more
involved in exchanges
and twinning programs,
taking advantage
of new e-links
(rather than exchanging
people which tended
to lead to a brain
drain). Similarly,
“trans-disciplinary
linkages to allow
for the cross-fertilization
of ideas, and
to exchange knowledge”
were encouraged.
Child-to-child
teaching
is a very
efficient
and cost-effective
means to
educate
large numbers
of children
and in particular
girls
|
Suggestions on
health also emerged.
“Scrapping
user fees for
health services”
was one contributor’s
simple way to
meet the health
and related Millennium
Development Goals:
“taking
money off poor
people when they
are sick is not
a good idea”.
Another contributor
wrote that “cash
and carry health
systems have to
be reformed”,
and noted the
emerging national
health insurance
scheme in Ghana
which could “prove
to be a useful
start for others”.
For HIV/AIDS,
another contributor
pointed to the
need to change
peoples’
behaviour, targeting
all members of
the family (citing
the vital role
of grandmothers
in bringing up
the next generation).
29/11/2004
Language and
water and sanitation
emerged as new
themes, both receiving
very little attention
in the Commission
for Africa’s
Consultation document,
at the same time
as continuing
discussions on
education and
culture and the
arts.
“Foreign
languages, especially
the English language,
have swallowed
several languages”
wrote one contributor,
highlighting problems
of “cultural
erosion”
for which African
TV, radio and
print media were
much to blame.
Indeed another
contributor noted
that “much
of local cultural
heritage is being
taken for granted
by Africans today
– especially
by the pivotal
(sub)urbanised
populations”.
The importance
of growing conurbations
such as Cairo,
Johannesburg,
Kinshasa and Nairobi
was mentioned
by a separate
contributor. On
the other side
of the world,
it was noted “the
North receives
a one dimensional
view of the South
driven either
by a (negative)
news agenda or
by the need to
raise money”.
Foreign
languages,
especially
the English
language,
have swallowed
several
languages
|
Returning to
the view that
“language
is a factor of
larger importance
in the continent’s
development than
is generally recognised”,
one contributor
advocated for
“well-designed
bilingual education”,
whether this be
(to cite two other
contributors)
to develop African
leaders or to
better train people
in their “roles
and responsibilities
as citizens or
a state”.
The multi-faceted
nature of citizenship,
central but not
explicitly stated
in many of the
messages posted
so far, was alluded
to again with
more calls to
ensure recognise
diversity of Africa
and ensure interventions
were ‘country-specific’.
One contributor,
however, pointed
to the many different
levels that existed
(and potentially
different forms
of communication
required for them),
from “pan-Africanism”
to a local scale.
New suggestions
on education related
to the communication
theme. A contributor
from International
House, Newcastle
(UK), expressed
the organisation’s
interest in training
teachers, particularly
from lusophone
Africa. Others
mentioned the
importance of
distance learning,
as well as vocational
and on-the-job
training. Conversely,
one message was
not to overdo
workshops as “some
civil servants
in Africa go from
one workshop to
another, with
very little time
in between for
work”.
some
civil servants
in Africa
go from
one workshop
to another,
with very
little time
in between
for work
|
A contrast was
provided by two
contributors giving
examples of cultural
exchange projects
they were involved
in. The Fiankoma
project, linking
the village of
Fiankoma in Ghana
and Brighton in
the UK, helped
Ghanaian participants
“represent
their own lives
and publish that
material via a
global information
medium”
as well as giving
them an impetus
to develop self-help
projects. The
Crossing Borders
project, linking
African writers
to UK-based mentors
helped “artists
… make connections
with each other
… to engage
in the difficult
acts of understanding
that transform
consciousness
and bring about
… changes
in perception
and attitudes”.
The need for
the “imaginative
use of arts and
culture”
was echoed by
many contributors
– not just
as an “adjunct”
but as an “integral
part of …
development programmes”.
Their importance
was echoed by
a Nigerian contributor
who lamented the
severe lack of
funding for arts
and culture in
the country.
Finally, messages
in the ‘Health,
water and sanitation’
subtopic finally
addressed water
and sanitation,
which “aren’t
particularly sexy
or newsworthy,
but are the priorities
of poor people”.
Another contributor
mentioned the
importance of
trans-boundary
water management,
particularly in
river basins such
as the Nile or
Zambezi. In the
same subtopic,
one contributor
stated that “We
cannot ignore
the female face
of the AIDS epidemic”,
explaining that
as at December
2003 women accounted
for 57% of people
living with HIV
in sub-Saharan
Africa. Separately,
the vulnerability
of orphans and
children was also
highlighted, with
a call for additional
earmarked resources
of at least 10%
of total HIV and
AID expenditure
to towards this
group.
Water
and sanitation
aren’t
particularly
sexy or
newsworthy,
but they
are the
priorities
of poor
people
|
|