ODI Logo
  ODI Home Page  
RAPID  Home
 

Improving Standards of Qualitative Research

These are three tools for policymakers to help ensure that the qualitative research they commission meets an acceptable standard.

i) Assessing the Quality of Qualitative Research

Best practice in the use of evidence in policymaking recognises that not all published, or unpublished, research meets the standards of validity, reliability and relevance needed for policymaking. The Cabinet Office Strategy Unit in conjunction with the National Centre for Social Research has developed a framework for assessing quality of research evidence. The framework provides a useful and useable guide for assessing the credibility, rigour and relevance of individual research studies. There are four central principles, which advise that research should be:

  • Contributory in advancing wider knowledge or understanding about policy, practice, theory or a particular substantive field
  • Defensible in design by providing a research strategy that can address the evaluative questions posed
  • Rigorous in conduct through the systematic and transparent collection, analysis and interpretation of qualitative data
  • Credible in claim through offering well founded and plausible arguments about the significance of the evidence generated

The guiding principles have been used to identify 18 appraisal questions to aid an assessment. Between them, they cover all of the key features and processes involved in qualitative enquiry. They begin with assessment of the findings, move through different stages of the research process (design, sampling, data collection, analysis and reporting) and end with some general features of research conduct (reflexivity and neutrality, ethics and auditability).

Source and more information


ii) Researching social policy: the uses of qualitative methods

This is an article by Sue Duncan [external website], Director of Policy Studies, Strategy Unit, Cabinet Office and Alan Hedges, independent research consultant and spokesperson for the Association for Qualitative Research. It examines the social policy role of qualitative research, based mainly on group discussion techniques, which is becoming a valuable tool to help local authorities and public bodies undertake public consultation and develop their policies


iii) Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) Research Methods Programme

This programme [external website] forms part of the ESRC's strategy to improve standards of research methods across the UK social science community. Funding seeks to:

  • Support substantively focused research that poses interesting/novel methodological issues.
  • Foster work that directly enhances methodological knowledge or improves and advances quantitative and qualitative methods.
  • Encourage and support the dissemination of good practice, including the enhancement of training programmes and training materials for the research community.
  • Establish fellowships linked to research funded through the programme, or linked to existing centres of methodological excellence.
  • Promote cross-national initiatives involving substantively focused and methodologically innovative research.

Source

Back to Evidence-based tools index or toolkit introduction

 
Last Updated: 13 January, 2009
www.odi.org.uk