|
Group Angered by Milk Adverts
A Sh10 million advertising campaign to entice Kenyans to
drink more processed milk came under heavy criticism yesterday
from a group of non-governmental organisations. They argued
that the campaign - largely financed by the country's main
processors and supported by the Kenya Dairy Board - was based
on largely unsubstantiated information, and would gravely
affect the country's thriving informal milk market.
Styling themselves as 'organisations with interest and expertise
in the dairy sub-sector,' the Institute of Policy Analysis
and Research, Intermediate Technology Development Group and
Strengthening Informal Sector Training and Expertise (SITE)
said the ongoing advertising blitz would have a 'negative
overall effect' on the majority of consumers, farmers and
milk traders who depend on the industry for their livelihoods.
Others supporting the sentiments were ActionAid Kenya and
International Livestock Research Institute.
'While it is the interest of the country to develop the highest
possible standards of quality and consumer safety, this should
not be done at the expense of the informal sector, which remains
the most successful component of the entire dairy business
in Kenya,' said Dr John Omiti of the Institute of Policy Analysis.
Launched early last month and executed by advertising house
Saracens, the 'Safe Milk Campaign,' has so far employed aggressive
advertising spots in the local electronic media, urging consumers
to go for processed milk as opposed to its raw substitute,
which is portrayed as prone to adulteration, dangerous handling
and possible conveyance of disease-causing organisms. But
to the NGOs who called a press conference at Chester House
yesterday, there might as well be no difference between the
two beyond the tagging of 'raw' and 'processed'.
'Raw milk does not pose some of the health risks often attributed
to it, since buyers boil milk before consumption. Milk quality
from unlicensed traders is as good as that from licensed ones.
Boiling of milk has the same effect as processing does in
the removing bacteria and associated health risks,' they asserted
in a joint statement. Contrary to claims in the adverts, a
study had found that few farmers added formalin and other
preservatives such as hydrogen peroxide to their milk, and
that this was the preserve of a few middlemen, some of whom
supply processors.
The success of the raw milk market - which supports 800,000
farmers and some 350,000 employees and accounts for 86% of
all milk sold in Kenya as opposed to just 14% for its processed
cousin - was based on an existing need for an affordable and
available milk product.
|