Chains and networks, territories and scales: towards a relational framework for analysing the global economy

A vast and continually expanding literature on economic globalisation continues to generate a miasma of conflicting viewpoints and alternative discourses. This article argues that any understanding of the global economy must be sensitive to four considerations: i) conceptual categories and labels carry with them the discursive power to shape material processes; ii) multiple scales of analysis must be incorporated in recognition of the contemporary 'relativisation of scale'; iii) no single institutional or organisational locus of analysis should be privileged; and iv) extrapolations from specific case studies and instances must be treated with caution, but this should not preclude the option of discussing the global economy, and power relations within it, as a structural whole. This paper advocates a network methodology as a potential framework to incorporate these concerns. Such a methodology requires us to identify actors in networks, their ongoing relations and the structural outcomes of these relations. Networks thus become the foundational unit of analysis for our understanding of the global economy, rather than individuals, firms or nation states. In presenting this argument we critically examine two examples of network methodology that have been used to provide frameworks for analysing the global economy: global commodity chains and actor-network theory. We suggest that, while they fall short of fulfilling the promise of a network methodology in some respects, they do provide indications of the utility of such a methodology as a basis for understanding the global economy.

(Abstract)