Go to ODI Web Site

click to download full paper (Adobe pdf 488kb)Building Effective Research Policy Networks: Linking Function and Form

We know that networks matter for international development. ODI is interested in learning more about how networks can help CSOs use evidence to influence policy processes. Evidence shows that networks are growing in number in developing countries, and between developing and developed countries. Increasingly, donors fund networked projects in different countries to draw on different skills and views. However, it seems that we know little about what makes networks work.

The functions of networks
Ongoing work on networks has so far focused on the functions that networks carry out:

  • Filter
  • Amplify
  • Convene
  • Invest/provide
  • Build communities
  • Facilitate

Based on a series of cases from around the world, but mostly from Peru and Cambodia, it seems that networks can carry out these functions within two broader roles of agency and/or support.

Having defined the functions that networks can play, the next step is to determine the structural characteristics (organisation, skills, resources, etc.) that networks need to have to be able perform them more effectively. For instance, what type of membership does a network need to be a successful amplifier? Is it the same as the membership needed for community building? Most likely the answer is not. Amplifiers will benefit from outward-looking members, whereas community builders will benefit from inward-looking ones.

This short paper addresses some of the main characteristics of networks to identify a set of criteria worth looking into to explain how networks can better carry out their given functions. This paper is based on the same premise as previous work: that, ideally, networks need to begin by defining the functions they want to play and then choosing their structure accordingly.

The form of networks
The literature and cases studied suggest that a series of factors affect a network's capacity to fulfil its roles and functions. These help us describe the network and what it is capable of doing.

  • Functions: What roles and functions does the network carry out? (Filter, amplify, invest/provide, convene, build communities and/or facilitate.)
  • Localisation and scope: Where are the network and its members located both physically and thematically?
  • Membership: Who are the network's members and how are they related to each other?
  • Governance: What are the behaviours and processes in place within the network that govern its short and long-term functioning?
  • Resources: Does the network have access to all the inputs necessary for its functioning?
  • Capacity and skill: Do the network and the network members have the capacity and skills necessary to carry out their functions and tasks?
  • Communications: Does the network have appropriate communication strategies to carry out its functions, thus amplifying messages outwardly or sharing messages and information within the institution?
  • External environment: What are the external influences affecting the network?
  • Strategic and adaptive capacity: Is the network capable of managing changes and shocks in both its internal and external environment? Can it manage those changes on its own or does it depend on others (partners, networks, donors)?

These criteria cover both the internal and external environment of the network and consider the structures and process that allow it to function and develop. Some of them are stressed by more than one. In essence, they provide a guide drawn from the literature and the understanding that the external environment, the internal organisation and the network's content matter equally when addressing success. Together, they affect the way a network works, providing them with opportunities in and challenges to achieving their objectives. Three key conclusions worth highlighting are as follows:

  • Many networks carry out many functions: identifying a direct link between form and functions is difficult.
  • There are, however, a series of organisational and functional characteristics that are specific to some roles.
  • Membership seems to be a critical aspect of the organisational characteristic of the networks.

More on networks...

Author:

Enrique Mendizabal

Date: October 2006
Full document:
ODI Working Paper 276 ( 488kb) or order printed copy
 
Top
 
Last Modified: 21 November, 2006  
Click here to access RAPID papers, reports, bibliographies & publications Click here for full details about specific project activities Click here for full details on recent &  future events - meetings, seminars & workshops Click here for a map of the site Click here for tools, theories & synthesis of research Click here for information on programme themes Click here for latest news & developments Click here for Homepage Click here for background to the programme Click here for programme team information Click here for links to related organisations & projects Click here for contact details Click here to search the RAPID website