|
Research Questions (Introduction
| Integrated | Politics
| Networks | Evidence)
Specific lessons about how different international development policy
areas are influenced by research in different coalitions are yet to be
learned. Comparative research on different policy areas is needed to understand
the differences between political and institution contexts, what is seen
as credible research, successful communication strategies, the influence
of key actors and the impact of relationships between researchers and
policy makers. It is our hypothesis that research is more likely to contribute
to evidence-based policy making that aims to reduce poverty, alleviate
suffering or save lives if:
- it fits within the political and institutional limits and pressures
of policy makers, and resonates with their ideological assumptions,
or sufficient pressure is exerted to challenge those limits;
- researchers and policy makers share particular kinds of networks and
develop chains of legitimacy for particular policy areas;
- outputs are based on local involvement and credible evidence and are
communicated via the most appropriate communicators, channels, style,
format and timing.
This hypothesis might be usefully tested by piecing together an historical
narrative of policy change. This would involve creating a timeline of
key policy decisions and practices, along with important documents and
events, and identifying key actors. The next, and more challenging step,
would be to explore why those policy decisions and practices took place
and assess the role of research in that process. To deal with these research
challenges posed by an historical approach it suggested that: various
interpretations of the past are critically reviewed by individual and
groups of informants; conflicting narratives are cross-checked against
documents and observations; and a range of methods, sources of information
and theoretical perspectives are used in order to triangulate the findings.
Introduction /
Previous
These pages are taken from Bridging Research and Policy: Context, Evidence
and Links. by Emma Crewe and John Young. ODI
Working Paper No. 173, 2002, Overseas Development Institute, London,
UK.
|