|
Evidence (Introduction
| Integrated | Politics
| Networks | Evidence)
The sources and conveyors of information may be as influential as the
content; for example, people accept information more readily from those
they trust. But it is our hypothesis that good quality research, local
involvement, accurate messages and effective dissemination strategies
are all important if aiming for more evidence-based policy-making. A lack
of local involvement in drawing conclusions from research can lead to
worrying impacts, such as children finding more abusive forms of work
when child labour was banned in certain industries.
The temptation to keep messages simple can be strong but they are then
more likely to be manipulated by policy makers to gloss over the complexity
of proposed solutions. There is no shortage of other ideas about why some
information makes a mark. The element of surprise can usefully attract
peoples attention but not if the contents of the message are impossible
for them to relate to their existing knowledge in any way.
Assessing the effectiveness of particular communication strategies on
particular audiences would appear to be an important part of any attempt
to change policy. Information technologies have huge possibilities for
communication within networks and coalitions but are not sufficient for
building trust, require investment in people as well as technology, can
be resisted, can accentuate exclusion, and can lead to the erosion of
public space.
Introduction /
Previous / Research
Questions
These pages are taken from Bridging Research and Policy: Context, Evidence
and Links. by Emma Crewe and John Young. ODI
Working Paper No. 173, 2002, Overseas Development Institute, London,
UK.
|