Transnational Think Tank Networks: Purpose, Membership and Cohesion

This short paper provides a brief overview over issues related to think tank networks. Think tank networks are different from public policy networks in that think tank networks are usually made up of organisations with more or less the same interests and fundamental views. In this respect they are similar to epistemic communities. Think tank networks are typically characterised by webs of relatively stable relationships and informal interactions based on these relations. They are also generally non-hierarchical, and attempt to pool and share resources in a mutual manner.

Struyk lists four criteria that can be used to classify different types of networks. [1] Objective. This can be for example efficient flow of knowledge among members, or specific spheres of influence. [2] Incentives for participation. The costs involved can be miniscule, or can increase as members are required to attend conferences and contribute regularly. These different types of effort required also bring different types of benefits, ranging from access to information to greater visibility and influence. [3] Basis for membership. Networks can be completely open, or restricted in various ways. [4] Network coherence. This refers to the degree to which the network manages to build effective working relations and a sense of community amongst its members.

Struyk goes on to apply these criteria to various existing networks. He highlights the fact that two-thirds of the networks have a specifically regional focus, which may be an advantage as far as knowledge sharing and policy influence are concerned.