ODI Logo
  ODI Home Page  
RAPID  Home
 

Why Hawked Milk Can Save Your Baby

New information about public health and milk marketing has recently become available from scientists in key research and development institutions in Kenya. They conducted comprehensive studies that included the laboratory analysis of hundreds of hawked and packed milk samples from randomly selected retailers and households in the country. The studies were conducted by the Smallholder Dairy (Research and Development) Project (SDP) and involved scientists from the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Kenya Agricultural Research Institute, University of Nairobi's Department of Public Health, Pharmacology and Toxicology and the International Livestock Research Institute. The Kenya Dairy Board and Kenya Bureau of Standards also participated in the project. Key findings of the SDP studies were:

  • Nearly 90% milk sold in Kenya is never pasteurised. It is sold either directly to consumers by farmers, or passes to consumers through small-scale traders, including hawkers. Dairy farmers (most of whom are smallholders with one or two cows) therefore depend much more on these traders than on processors such as Kenya Cooperative Creameries (KCC). Training for smallholder farmers and milk traders is therefore required to ensure that milk is handled hygienically so that consumers receive good milk.
  • Nearly 100% of consumers boiled milk before drinking it (mostly in the form of tea), thereby eliminating all risks from harmful bacteria. Public health threats from any bacterial contamination of hawked milk are therefore routinely eliminated by the consumer practice of boiling milk before consumption.
  • Only 10% of hawked milk tested was found to be adulterated with water; most cases occurred in the dry season when milk shortages occur. The widespread claims that all hawked milk is adulterated were therefore not supported by evidence.
  • Consumers buy raw milk because it is cheaper by 20 to 50% than pasteurised milk in most parts of the country, and because consumers regard it as higher quality than standardised pasteurised milk.
  • A major health risk that was identified was the large number (up to 15%) of both packed and raw milk samples that contained antibiotic residues. The negative implications of this are that over time, there is the possibility of the development of drug resistance, and that the common, cheap antibiotics that are used to treat various ailments will no longer be effective. That would mean resorting to new and more expensive antibiotics for treatment. This is a scenario that should certainly be avoided, especially for a poor country such as Kenya. Again training is required, particularly of dairy farmers and veterinary assistants and drug suppliers.

Current legislation for the dairy industry used for regulating the sale of raw milk dates back to the 1950s, when dairy farming and marketing in urban areas in Kenya was dominated by large-scale European settler farmers and KCC. The situation is now completely different and demands both appropriate legislation that is more inclusive and a concerted training programme to ensure hygienic milk production and marketing practices.

The researchers rightly point out that the competition amongst alternative milk market channels in a liberalised Kenya should be fought on the basis of both price and quality, and not on false perceptions of health threats from consuming milk. It is important for the health and development of Kenyan children that they are encouraged to drink milk, and more of it, contributing to an adequate intake of micronutrients, protein and energy. Your baby will be much safer consuming boiled hawked milk than not consuming milk at all - the choice that prices and buying power dictate for many Kenyans.

Author: Omore, A.
Date: 2004
Type of publication: Newspaper Article
Publisher: City Farmer, Canada's Office of Urban Agriculture
Available on-line at:
www.ilri.cgiar.org/data/ilrievents/CleanVsDirty.asp
 
Last Updated: 13 January, 2009
www.odi.org.uk