'At present, evidence-based policy seems to be principally a British commitment'.

'What works?' has become a buzz word in political spheres, and practitioners are showing a greater interest in demonstrating the efficacy of particular practices. The author examines the reasons for the recent upsurge in interest in evidence-based policy and practice in the UK. The entrance of a Labour government in 1997 with a pragmatic and anti-ideological stance is highlighted as a central cause.

What counts as evidence?
Research findings, be it academic or otherwise, is but one method in generating evidence (or knowledge); 'Evidence is more plural than research'. Knowledge is also formed by experience, shared norms, values, ideas however not all of this knowledge has equal validity. The extent to which the difference knowledge is relevant, representative and reliable is centrally important.

Knowledge as power?
Policy making is not apolitical, nor is it solely based on evidence or research findings; 'Securing and retaining power is a necessary condition for the achievement of policy objectives.' There is therefore, 'a close relationship between evidence (or knowledge) and power in which evidence may be used both to strengthen power and influence.'

The paper concludes that although the evidence-based approach to policy and practice offers the research community major new opportunities, 'it would be wise to remain modest in its claim to improve the conduct of public affairs.'

Back to EBP bibliography index